The Evolution of Hotel Brand Affiliation
Throughout history, hotel owners have faced the critical decision of whether to align themselves with a well-known brand or operate independently. The choice to affiliate with a brand offers numerous advantages, such as access to reservation systems, loyal clientele, shared marketing initiatives, brand recognition among consumers, and credibility within the financial sector. However, this affiliation comes at a cost, requiring owners to pay various fees for royalty, marketing, reservation services, and guest loyalty programs, while also adhering to prescribed facility and service standards.
On the other hand, operating independently liberates owners from franchise-related expenses and presents them with more autonomy in terms of facilities, services, and operational practices. Yet, without the backing of national or global marketing campaigns, independent hotels must rely on their individual reputation and appeal to cater to specific types of travelers.
The Rise of Soft Brands in the Hospitality Industry
Around the turn of the millennium, a new option emerged for hotel owners: the concept of soft brands. This innovative approach has since transformed into what is now known as the “lifestyle space,” encompassing a wide range of hotel categories across the industry’s chain scales. The inception of the soft brand trend can be traced back to the early 1980s and 1990s when luxurious properties, predominantly independent hotels located in prime urban settings or upscale resort destinations, began gaining prominence.
Esteemed visionaries like Ian Schrager, founder of Morgans Hotel Group, and Bill Kimpton, creator of Kimpton Hotels & Restaurants, played pivotal roles in shaping the soft brand landscape. Following suit, brands like Joie de Vivre and the renowned W brand, introduced by Barry Sternlicht, further revolutionized the concept of luxury lifestyle accommodations marked by cutting-edge design, imbued with personalized local experiences and captivating narratives.
Throughout the 2000s, major hospitality players such as Marriott, Hilton, Starwood, and IHG embarked on aggressive growth strategies to expand their soft brand portfolios. This strategic move aimed to enhance their product offerings within a broader market segment, catering to affluent customers while bolstering their market share through acquisitions and organic brand development.
Soft Brand Advantages Over Independent Properties
Soft brands represent a middle ground between independent hotels and core-branded establishments, offering the best of both worlds. These hotels benefit from core brand marketing programs and reservation systems while retaining a degree of flexibility in setting their own standards for facilities, services, and operations. Ideal for owners seeking to preserve their hotel’s historical identity, soft brands also accommodate the emergence of “hybrid hotels,” properties with elevated but streamlined amenities that may not meet traditional core brand requirements.
As developers weigh the financial implications of aligning with a core brand versus opting for a soft brand or maintaining independence, factors such as profitability and cost efficiency come into play. Analysis by CBRE comparing performance metrics of soft branded and independent upper-upscale hotels reveals varying profit margins at the gross operating profit level.
Conclusion: A Dynamic Landscape for Hoteliers
Overall, the evolution of soft brands within the hospitality industry has ushered in a new era of diversity and choice for both consumers and hotel owners. With a plethora of options available, each catering to unique niches and preferences, the future remains bright for independent properties, soft brands, and traditional franchise hotels alike.
View the original article and our Inspiration here
